America: Forced Prostitution.

September 2nd, 2010

She, America, in the scheme of history is just a girl-child.  Only 234 years old.

Based on found comments on the web.  One writer says I may use his thoughts if he remains annonomous.

Is she now being sold into child-slavery?

Here’s the evidence:

Leading Foreign owners of US Treasury Securities (May 2010)

Nation/Territory billions of dollars percentage

People’s Republic of China (mainland) 867.7 21.9

Japan 786.7 19.8

United Kingdom 350.0 8.8

Brazil 161.4 4.1

Hong Kong (Special Administrative Region) 145.7 3.7

Russia 126.8 3.2

Republic of China (Taiwan) 126.2 3.2

Grand Total 3963.6 100%

“I, for one, would infinitely prefer a civil war to dictatorship. In that, am I not following the Founding Fathers: ‘Give me liberty or give me death’?

“I think dictatorship is near. That Marxist gangster in the White House hates America, and exhibits “every act that may define a tyrant.” But I also think massive peaceful resistance to dictatorship is near–in fact, has already begun. We are now in a civil war, in which one side, the criminal gang that has seized the machinery of government, oppresses innocent citizens with unconstitutional so-called laws, and the innocent citizens in response are fighting back with peaceful protests and campaigning.

“Marxist bastard, the Weather Underground gangster who hates America! His criminal regime is enslaving and plundering our nation! And this communist piece of shit even wants CENSORSHIP, so he can stop us from critizing him! Americans of the future will spit on his memory.

“OBAMA, YOU GODDAMN COMMUNIST TRAITOR, TO PRISON WITH YOU! BARNEY FRANK, YOU TRAITOR, TO PRISON WITH YOU! PELOSI, YOU TRAITOR, TO PRISON WITH YOU! ALL THE REST OF YOU GANGSTERS, TO PRISON WITH YOU! THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND IS THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, NOT YOUR WILL!

”’No one should be surprised, of course, that the Department of Blame America First is prostrating itself before the likes of repressive U.N. Human Rights Council members Libya, Cuba, Saudi Arabia and China. No one should be surprised that Obama’s globalist panderers couldn’t simply keep their mouths shut and refrain from trashing Americans with whom they disagree. In May, you’ll recall, Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor Michael Posner preemptively trashed our country’s human rights record to Chinese government officials …’”

“Omar, we must strive

To hide this shameful weakness, save my glory,

And let me reign o’er a deluded world:

For Mahomet depends on fraud alone,

And to be worshipped never must be known.”’

“The same could be said of the Marxist Messiah, that America-hating criminal currently usurping the White House.”

“Obama is like a drooling pervert, itching to rape and defile a child. Only he’s raping the United States of America. IMPEACH THE COMMUNIST GANGSTER! WE OWE NO ALLEGIANCE TO TYRANTS!

And here’s a picture of America’s pimp:

obama_blog

Opinion on Beethoven

July 11th, 2010

One of Ayn Rand’s most profound observations never made it into print—at least until recently. In her notes for The Fountainhead, she observed that while the Left couches its agenda in terms of economics, its real motive is a hostility toward individual achievement in any field, including art and ideas. She says of her leftist villain, Ellsworth Toohey, “He says that he is fighting Rockefeller and Morgan; he is fighting Beethoven and Shakespeare.”
TIA Daily

Listen to Beethoven’s Adagio, Sonata No 31 about to 3:25 into it.

Hear the influence of Beethoven on later composers.  Hear the delirium of Sibelius’ last symphony.  You’ll hear Beethoven.
And on and on it goes.

beethoven_s

Beethoven
Pencil
9 x 5¼”
1993

His Egmont and Leonore, No. 3 are just right for the energy he offers for my countless thousands of pencil cross-hatchings’ tiny marks go onto the paper rapidly, along with B’s “encouragement”.  All I can do is say a mental “Thank you, great composers.”   I see the great composers as if they composed in slow motion, as they must have.  I hear it that way.  What great heroes they are!

Ayn Rand says about Beethoven what she hears in his music:  “…[that man] must struggle just the same…the view that man must struggle even though he has no chance of winning and must perish heroically.”–Ayn Rand  This you will not find in his later works.

Beethoven was the 1st Romantic.  Yes, there was a struggle.  He was a transformational figure.  Too much repetition.  But in his Overtures, especially his “Leonore, no. 3″ I hear so much that later composers found in him.  Yes, Schubert was more a Romantic (hear his great Sonata D. 960, 1st movement) and Von Weber was up there too.  But Beethoven’s struggle was to get there.

Short Question. Long Answer.

May 7th, 2010

During my first tour in Vietnam with Recon, I never saw a city. Only rarely, small villes. Second tour with MP’s, for six weeks I’d drive the radio jeep into DaNang City every night at 1800, and stay overnight standing radio watch at the ARVN compound. One evening a farmer across the way invited me to his house for supper with his family. I did once have a taste of Vietnamese food. I recall that his instruction on Vietnamese etiquette was to either eat it all, or to save some for leftovers.  I don’t remember which.  And I don’t remember the taste of the meal.

In the early 1990’s I was in Chicago with a fellow VN Vet, Jerry Landman.  This man was Army, had worked in intelligence.  He spoke perfect Vietnamese.  I was there to donate three of my paintings on the subject of the Vietnam War to the National Vietnam Veterans Art Museum.  Here’s one:

little_men
Little Men
Watercolor
11 ½  x 14 ¼”
1991

The “doggie” (affectionate term for an Army soldier) took me to “Little Vietnam”, a place of some 4 square blocks around Argyle Street.  This area was hotter and more humid than the rest of Chicago.  There were plucked ducks hanging in the windows of some shops.  We went into a music shop that had traditional and modern Vietnamese CDs.  I felt right at home, as the signs were in both English and Vietnamese as I recall things were in DaNang City.

little_saigon_chicago
In a small cafe we ordered dinner.  I didn’t know what to order so Jerry did so.  He told the 18 year old waitress in Vietnamese what he wanted.  She said she didn’t understand Vietnamese and asked her mother to come over.  It was hilarious.  The mother enjoyed conversing with Jerry, and the girl enjoyed showing off that she was completely Americanized.  That was my introduction to Vietnamese pancakes.

You asked the name of our Vietnamese restaurant here in Lafayette.  It’s “House of Saigon”.  Here’s part of the menu:

house_of_saigon_cover_s2house_of_saigon_cover_inside_s

I mentioned “Vietnamese Pancakes”.  That’s what I call them.  All Vietnamese restaurants I’ve been to know what I mean.  Here, they’re called Vietnamese Crepes.

Enjoy!

It’s God or America

April 5th, 2010

In the novel “The War After Armageddon” by Ralph Peters, he shows America of the near future.  I don’t think it has a happy ending.  In it are several great military heroes.

America’s military still has an Army, Air Force and Marines.  But these are being swallowed up by America’s new force, “MOBIC” — The Military Order of the Brothers in Christ.

The war is against Islamic Totalitarianism.  The battles are being fought in what used to be Israel.  The commander of the Marine Corps has just been threatened by the commander of MOBIC that if he doesn’t do as ordered — to slaughter thousands of innocent civilian Muslims — well, says the MOBIC commander, “Hasn’t the Corps always done more [than the Army] with less?  Fought harder?  And had less thanks?  Might it not be … wiser … for the Marines to rethink their present loyalties?”

The Marine Corps commander thinks on the situation:

“God’s plan?  This?  All this?  He didn’t understand how any man with eyes in his head could believe in any kind of god.  After the things he’d seen in the Nigeria fighting, the horrors in Delta State, he’d abandoned his last, perfunctory religious habits.  Men had to take responsibility for their own failings, their own viciousness, their own deeds.  That was humanity’s one slim hope.  Blaming the world’s horrors on a punitive deity or on a scheming Satan who wanted to spoil the porridge was the coward’s way out.  Years back, Morris had read something to the effect that, even if there was no God, men should behave as if He existed.  A lifetime of coping with what men wrought had convinced Morris that the aphorist, whoever he’d been, had got it exactly backward:  If there was a God, men should act as if He didn’t exist and couldn’t be blamed for the messes they made themselves.  Real men took responsibility.  Wasn’t that at the heart of being a Marine?  To shoulder responsibilities of a dreadful order when all the others fled, trailing excuses and pointing fingers toward the sky?”

The Marine Corps holds two conflicting slogans:

“Duty.  God.  Country.”
“Honor.  Courage.  Commitment.”

Let us pray that in such a dilemma as presented in this book that the Marine Corps would choose to live by the latter.

america_enemies_sAgainst All Enemies,
Foreign And Domestic.

Robert Tracy
Photoshop
2007

(Click image for enlarged view.)

The Ecstasy of Sacrifice

March 27th, 2010

I wonder if all sides get an arousal or orgasm over their agreed creed of the worship of sacrifice.

mantegna_man_of_sorrowsAndrea Mantegna
The Man of Sorrows
circa 1485-1490
Wood; H. 78 cm; W. 48 cm

This will be the year of religion.  The Dems will succeed in usurping the Conservatives’ basic tenet of Christianity against them.  Both hold the same fundamentals.  Who will win?  The rulers in power.  Both of them.  The current rulers are calling the evil they’re doing a moral issue.  It is.

Read at least Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged”.  Not for its accurate prediction, when published in 1957, of today’s economic crisis.  But for the moral revolution she invents.  Only Ayn Rand can save America.

All further quotes by Ayn Rand (emphases omitted).

“Sacrifice” is the surrender of a greater value for the sake of a lesser one or of a nonvalue. Thus, altruism gauges a man’s virtue by the degree to which he surrenders, renounces or betrays his values (since help to a stranger or an enemy is regarded as more virtuous, less “selfish,” than help to those one loves). The rational principle of conduct is the exact opposite: always act in accordance with the hierarchy of your values, and never sacrifice a greater value to a lesser one.

This applies to all choices, including one’s actions toward other men. It requires that one possess a defined hierarchy of rational values (values chosen and validated by a rational standard). Without such a hierarchy, neither rational conduct nor considered value judgments nor moral choices are possible.
“The Ethics of Emergencies,” The Virtue of Selfishness, 44.

And if you wish to go on living, what you now need is not to return to morality—you who have never known any—but to discover it.

For centuries, the battle of morality was fought between those who claimed that your life belongs to God and those who claimed that it belongs to your neighbors—between those who preached that the good is self-sacrifice for the sake of ghosts in heaven and those who preached that the good is self-sacrifice for the sake of incompetents on earth. And no one came to say that your life belongs to you and that the good is to live it.

Let them discover the kind of doctors that their system will now produce. Let them discover, in their operating rooms and hospital wards, that it is not safe to place their lives in the hands of a man whose life they have throttled. It is not safe, if he is the sort of man who resents it—and still less safe, if he is the sort who doesn’t.”

It stands to reason that where there’s sacrifice, there’s someone collecting sacrificial offerings. Where there’s service, there’s someone being served. The man who speaks to you of sacrifice, speaks of slaves and masters. And intends to be the master.
Ayn Rand, “The Fountainhead”, The Soul of a Collectivist

Your impracticable creed . . . [inculcates a] lethal tenet: the belief that the moral and the practical are opposites. Since childhood, you have been running from the terror of a choice you have never dared fully to identify: If the practical, whatever you must practice to exist, whatever works, succeeds, achieves your purpose, whatever brings you food and joy, whatever profits you, is evil—and if the good, the moral, is the impractical, whatever fails, destroys, frustrates, whatever injures you and brings you loss or pain—then your choice is to be moral or to live.

The sole result of that murderous doctrine was to remove morality from life. You grew up to believe that moral laws bear no relation to the job of living, except as an impediment and threat, that man’s existence is an amoral jungle where anything goes and anything works. And in that fog of switching definitions which descends upon a frozen mind, you have forgotten that the evils damned by your creed were the virtues required for living, and you have come to believe that actual evils are the practical means of existence. Forgetting that the impractical “good” was self-sacrifice, you believe that self-esteem is impractical; forgetting that the practical “evil” was production, you believe that robbery is practical.

Swinging like a helpless branch in the wind of an uncharted moral wilderness, you dare not fully to be evil or fully to live. When you are honest, you feel the resentment of a sucker; when you cheat, you feel terror and shame. When you are happy, your joy is diluted by guilt; when you suffer, your pain is augmented by the feeling that pain is your natural state. You pity the men you admire, you believe they are doomed to fail; you envy the men you hate, you believe they are the masters of existence. You feel disarmed when you come up against a scoundrel: you believe that evil is bound to win, since the moral is the impotent, the impractical.
Galt’s Speech, For the New Intellectual, 171.

Morality, to you, is a phantom scarecrow made of duty, of boredom, of punishment, of pain, a cross-breed between the first schoolteacher of your past and the tax collector of your present, a scarecrow standing in a barren field, waving a stick to chase away your pleasures—and pleasure, to you, is a liquor-soggy brain, a mindless slut, the stupor of a moron who stakes his cash on some animal’s race, since pleasure cannot be moral.

If you identify your actual belief, you will find a triple damnation—of yourself, of life, of virtue—in the grotesque conclusion you have reached: you believe that morality is a necessary evil.

Thus, altruism gauges a man’s virtue by the degree to which he surrenders, renounces or betrays his values (since help to a stranger or an enemy is regarded as more virtuous, less “selfish,” than help to those one loves).
The Virtue of Selfishness “The Ethics of Emergencies,” The Virtue of Selfishness, 44.

If you give money to help a friend, it is not a sacrifice; if you give it to a worthless stranger, it is. If you give your friend a sum you can afford, it is not a sacrifice; if you give him money at the cost of your own discomfort, it is only a partial virtue, according to this sort of moral standard; if you give him money at the cost of disaster to yourself—that is the virtue of sacrifice in full.
You are told that moral perfection is impossible to man—and, by this standard, it is. You cannot achieve it so long as you live, but the value of your life and of your person is gauged by how closely you succeed in approaching that ideal zero which is death.

The creed of sacrifice is a morality for the immoral—a morality that declares its own bankruptcy by confessing that it can’t impart to men any personal stake in virtues or values, and that their souls are sewers of depravity, which they must be taught to sacrifice. By its own confession, it is impotent to teach men to be good and can only subject them to constant punishment.
For the New Intellectual Galt’s Speech, For the New Intellectual, 139.

It stands to reason that where there’s sacrifice, there’s someone collecting sacrificial offerings. Where there’s service, there’s someone being served. The man who speaks to you of sacrifice, speaks of slaves and masters. And intends to be the master.
For the New Intellectual “The Soul of a Collectivist,” For the New Intellectual, 73.

Christ, in terms of the Christian philosophy, is the human ideal. He personifies that which men should strive to emulate. Yet, according to the Christian mythology, he died on the cross not for his own sins but for the sins of the nonideal people. In other words, a man of perfect virtue was sacrificed for men who are vicious and who are expected or supposed to accept that sacrifice. If I were a Christian, nothing could make me more indignant than that: the notion of sacrificing the ideal to the nonideal, or virtue to vice. And it is in the name of that symbol that men are asked to sacrifice themselves for their inferiors. That is precisely how the symbolism is used.
“Playboy’s Interview with Ayn Rand,” March 1964.

“…this is not a battle over material goods. It’s a moral crisis, the greatest the world has ever faced and the last. Our age is the climax of centuries of evil. We must put an end to it, once and for all, or perish—we, the men of the mind. It was our own guilt. We produced the wealth of the world—but we let our enemies write its moral code.”

“You have heard it said that this is an age of moral crisis. You have said it yourself, half in fear, half in hope that the words had no meaning. You have cried that man’s sins are destroying the world and you have cursed human nature for its unwillingness to practice the virtues you demanded. Since virtue, to you, consists of sacrifice, you have demanded more sacrifices at every successive disaster.  In the name of a return to morality, you have sacrificed all those evils which you held as the cause of your plight. You have sacrificed justice to mercy. You have sacrificed independence to unity. You have sacrificed reason to faith. You have sacrificed wealth to need. You have sacrificed self-esteem to self-denial. You have sacrificed happiness to duty.

“You have destroyed all that which you held to be evil and achieved all that which you held to be good. Why, then, do you shrink in honor from the sight of the world around you? That world is not the product of your sins, it is the product and the image of your virtues. It is your moral ideal brought into reality in its full and final perfection. You have fought for it, you have dreamed of it, and you have wished it….”
–Atlas Shrugged

The three rules listed below are by no means exhaustive; they are merely the first leads to the understanding of a vast subject.

1.

In any conflict between two men (or two groups) who hold the same basic principles, it is the more consistent one who wins.
2.

In any collaboration between two men (or two groups) who hold different basic principles, it is the more evil or irrational one who wins.
3.

When opposite basic principles are clearly and openly defined, it works to the advantage of the rational side; when they are not clearly defined, but are hidden or evaded, it works to the advantage of the irrational side.
“The Anatomy of Compromise,”
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 145.

Watch out for Huckabee.  He’s as smooth a talker as the current ruler of America.  If there is to be another presidential election, fear this man.  He’s the most dangerous one on the other side.

The Bastard

March 22nd, 2010

My original title for the painting was “God”, for I feel it shows the essence of all man’s gods.

I shall call it here “The Bastard”.

the_bastard_s1

The Bastard
Oils on canvas
20 x 18″
1991

I will never call this evil thing my president.  It’s the most evil creature in all of history because it’s doing this to America.  Unlike Pol Pot or Stalin’s evil, this is being done to the most sublime achievement in human history.

God damn this bastard!

A “Vermeer” Great

March 13th, 2010

My friend Marvin Steel sent this to me.

ursula_van_lach_s

I wrote, “This is not a one day painting, no?  I’ve seen so many variations on Vermeer’s subject, always bad.”  [this includes my own].

He wrote “It took on and off 3 years, not steady work.  All together maybe a month of everyday work. He paid me out slowly and finally he said he had enough money for me to finish it, so I did.”

Click HERE for enlarged version.

Family Life Stories

February 24th, 2010

Warning!  Politically Incorrect Language!

This was my family from 1967 through 1968.  Yes, Marine Corps tours were 13 months, while the other branches were 12.  This shows most of the platoon.  We were rarely apart.  Here we are at China Beach in DaNang, Vietnam for a one-day R & R with steaks and beer.

platoon_china_beach

Each of us were together at one time or another on 5-day patrols, although the number of men on the patrol would range from five, seven or more depending on the complexity and danger of the patrol.  We’d go in for five days and then five days back to base.

On one 5-day jungle patrol during the Monsoon season we got socked in because of the weather.  After we ran out of c-rats we spent the next five days talking about our favorite foods.  McDonalds came in first for favorites.  Steve Rainey nigger-rigged a safety-pin and a line (oh we carried just about anything) so one would fish in the fast moving swollen brown river while another stood guard with his rifle even though we knew we were probably safe, for the enemy were living under the same conditions — hunkered down.  We got a call from the Commander of the 1st Marine Division to hang in there.  Steve Rainey did find a large lizard climbing up a tree.  He took out his KA-Bar fighting knife, cut off the head, cooked it and ate it.  None of us took him up on the offer to share in his meal.  After that we took to calling him “Rainy”.  On the tenth day, there was a break in the clouds and the chopper extracted us.  Back at base around 8PM the mess hall had been opened up with a big special meal for us of Steak and the whole meal deal.  We found to our surprise that we couldn’t eat much.  After five days without food our stomachs had shrunk.

Arnold Leal (later badly wounded), born in Mexico to an American mother and brought up in Texas, asked us to call him just “Spick”.  Jim DeMello (later badly wounded by 30. cal machine gun fire — shattered both femurs) was from Hawaii, a citizen of the US from the recently new state.  We called him “Hawaii”.  The “dark green Marine” — as we called Negro Marines — was a gentle quiet person who we did make fun of for his taking photos back at base of the clouds in the sky.  He wanted us to call him simply “Nigger”.  There was a Mormon who got special treatment to return to somewhere out of country for a yearly meeting.  Mike Rubenstein was Jewish.  We had a man from Alabama who was still a Confederate at heart so we called him either “Rebel” or “Stretch” (he was 6′ 6″ and weighed maybe 150 lbs.).  On Christmas day, 1967, on our first mission at Dong Din — a hilltop some 800 meters high, usually shrouded by low-lying clouds — “Rebel” received a present.  A small plane flew over and dropped a newspaper.  It was an Alabama paper.  Tiento — who does not appear in the photo — we called “Savage”.  He came from an Indian Reservation.  Tiento returned to the reservation and later died of — wouldn’t you know it? — alcoholism.  Soloman we called “Dope” because that’s what he was, a dope-smoking hippie wannabe.  I was called “Tracer”.  This has more than one meaning.  But being ambidextrous I had the strongest throwing arm.  Right-handed my grenade would travel farthest.  Close up left hand was most accurate.

Steve Thorne was a lumberjack from Washington state.  We called him “Thorn”.  Half way through his tour he couldn’t take another patrol, saw a psychiatrist, and we never saw him again.  McClosky was our platoon commander, a 1st Lt..  We called him “Sir” except on patrol when we whispered his name “Jim” so any enemy within hearing wouldn’t know.  The enemy would take out the commander first and the radio operator (me).  Boyle we called “Boil” after he was the second, after “Dope”, to come down with Malaria.

The rest of us were just Caucasians.  Guess we had every race and religion except an A-rab and a Slant-eye.

And I saw in my four years only one female Marine — BAM (Broad Ass Marine), but never in combat.  I did have a female friend in the military, Mary Therese Klinker, who was a year ahead of me in school and my sister’s best friend.  She was a Captain in the Air Force; a flight nurse — Killed in Vietnam in 1975.

All these were affectionate terms we all agreed to, either chosen by oneself or by our brother Marines.

Back to the Future

February 12th, 2010

“The centrality of the politics of slavery in shaping antebellum southern attitudes toward religion in government became even clearer during secession and the Civil War…When the South left the Union and no longer needed to defend slavery from northern attack, religion became extremely important in the attempt to create a Confederate nation.  The new Confederacy went further toward establishing the religious authority of the state than the old Republic ever had.

“The Confederacy sought to align the state with God and the church with the state as never before…In May 1861, the Southern Baptist Convention…invoke[d] ‘Divine direction and favor’ on the new government.  In a sermon preached the following month, Benjamin Morgan Palmer, a Presbyterian minister who believed the war was ‘between religion and atheism,’ went even further.  A nation was more than ‘a dead abstraction, signifying only the aggregation of individuals,’ Palmer proclaimed; it was ‘a sort of person before God’ and God called it, like other persons, to judgment.  Southerners therefore needed to confess their sins, the New Orleans minister continued, not individual sins…but national sins.  He then listed several, including the failure of the founders to make ‘a clear national recognition of God at the outset of the nation’s career.’  But, Palmer quickly added, he rejoiced that the Confederacy had receded ‘from this perilous atheism’ and formally, solemnly, and unequivocally acknowledged ‘Almighty God’ in its ‘fundamental law.’

“The idea of acknowledging God in the Confederate Constitution originated with Thomas R.R. Cobb, a Georgian, a devout Presbyterian…He convinced the committee drafting  a provisional document to begin its proposed constitution, ‘In the name of Almighty God.’  After rejecting that wording and another offered by William P. Chilton, the provisional Congress voted four states to one to put ‘Invoking the favor of Almighty God’ in the provisional constitution.  When the Confederate Congress adopted a permanent constitution,…it invoked not only the favor but the ‘guidance of Almighty God.’  The Confederate Congress also put the phrase ‘Deo Vindice’ [with God as protector] on the national seal….

“In addition to endowing the Confederate government with religious authority, some members of its Congress wanted to establish its moral powers as well…Religious freedom was important, Chilton argued, but preserving it did not mean that Congress must pass laws that ‘ignore the existence and overruling Providence of the Supreme Being’ or that contravene ‘His known will.’  Since the Confederate government ‘professes to “invoke the favor and guidance of Almighty God,” it should not’ trammel ‘His statutes’ nor defy ‘His authority.’ Nor should the government ‘do violence to religion and the moral sense of the community.’”

Moral Reconstruction:  Christian Lobbyists and the Federal Legislation of Morality, 1865 - 1920. Chapter One, The Antebellum Moral Polity by Gaines M. Foster (2002). p.19 - 20.

A Soldiers Prayer by Bob Graham

A Soldier's Prayer by Bob Graham

Sound familiar?  Substitute “The Confederacy” with today’s misreading of the American Constitution and The Declaration of Independence.

Glenn Beck says that “what made America unique was that it was founded on divine providence…Like[America's founders]I believe that the true secret to our country’s success is the belief that our rights are given to us by God and lent to our government only so they can protect our rights to life and liberty while we pursue happiness.” What Beck won’t quote is Thomas Jefferson’s entire statement about “Question with boldness.” Given Beck’s passion for our founders, why would he omit this quote?  Could Beck actually agree with the Confederates’ call to slavery to a God?

“Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear.”

“The Constitution…contained no appeal to God for sanction or guidance…The Constitution left both religion and morality to the states. The First Amendment…did nothing to undermine the secular nature of the new federal government. Rather, the Bill of Rights, of which it was a part, affirmed and codified the Revolution’s emphasis on individual liberty. The First Amendment did not apply to the states, of course. Most provided some acknowledgment of God’s guidance in their constitutions, and in all, regulating public morality remained…a “crucial obligation.” Even the states, though, disestablished religion. Starting in Virginia in 1785 and ending in Massachusetts in 1833, all of the states that had once had established churches separated church and state.”

Moral Reconstruction: Christian Lobbyists and the Federal Legislation of Morality, 1865 - 1920. Chapter One, The Antebellum Moral Polity by Gaines M. Foster (2002). p.9.

My Personal “Conspiracy Theory”

January 30th, 2010

“It is thus necessary that the individual should finally come to realize that his own ego is of no importance in comparison with the existence of his nation; that the position of the individual ego is conditioned solely by the interests of the nation as a whole…that above all the unity of a nation’s spirit and will are worth more than the freedom of the spirit and will of an individual…”

“This state of mind, which subordinates the interests of the ego to the conservation of the community, is really the first premise for every truly human culture….The basic attitude from which such activity arises, we call — to distinguish it from egoism and selfishness — idealism.  By this we understand only the individual’s capacity to make sacrifices for the community, for his fellow men.”

Does this sound familiar?  These quotes were made by a man freely elected as the leader of his nation.  They were given at Buckeburg, Oct. 7, 1933.  By Adolph Hitler.

Führer is the unique name granted by Obama to himself.  Although he doesn’t call it that, Führer (in German) means “Leader”.

This enables Obama the power to promulgate laws by decree, by Executive Order, without participation by the other branches of government.

Obama, as our “Dear Leader”, has designated himself as Führer.  He pretends to take responsibility for “errors”, all the while harking back to the “plate” he was dealt from the past eight years.

This position formally makes him Head of State as well as Head of Government respectively; in practice the dictator of America.

How else can he attack the Supreme Court (praise goes to Justice Alito –he’s the single hero I’ve been looking for.  His mouthing “that’s not true” should go down in history as the best America has today.)

To hold the House and Senate in Obama’s secret meetings can only mean the fear of his total power has reached them.  Not one of our representitives has the courage to practice what is preached to them and what is their own fundamental moral imperitive.  I.e., self-sacrifice.  Why not?  Obama knows their home addresses and that they have families.  And only he holds a monopoly of the use of legalized force.  He has the guns.

The Führer doesn’t seem a bit concerned about the mid-term elections.  There won’t be any.  That’s my prediction.  Obama has invited our enemies to attack America.  When they do — it will be soon enough — the Führer will realize his totalitarian regime that he already has in place.  How gleeful (and fake-sounding) it will be for him to declare more than Marshal Law.  No, he will join his anti-American friends and declare himself as dictator for life.  This will be the end of freedom in America.

obama_fuhrer

If you want to know what’s happening to America.  Hurry and read Leonard Peikoff’s book “The Ominous Parallels“.


  • Viagra online
  • Order cheap cialis
  • Buy viagra no prescription
  • Cialis online
  • Buy generic cialis
  • Order propecia no prescription
  • Cheap propecia online
  • Propecia online pharmacy
  • Order levitra online
  • Cheap price cialis
  • Online pharmacy levitra
  • Buy viagra online
  • Buy discount levitra
  • Cheap cialis online
  • Propecia hair loss